- This topic has 47 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by
.
-
Posts
-
-
There are a couple of possible experiment sessions in the pipeline, with groups who have approached me, but more often than not they don’t pan out. It would be nice to get a better than 50% success rate.
Anyway, the reason for my post is that someone has suggested, a few times now, that I should do an experiment for people of the sub tendency. His idea is I should get a few subs together (him included) and do some like one of the original experiment sessions, to see how all the participants being subs would change the dynamic.
I thought I’d ask for opinions, to be fair to him, he’s complained that I didn’t open it for discussion on the forum.
Another question, could we get enough together in one place?
Gary likes this
-
So how would the experiments work?
Would they be aimed at “forcing/telling” the participants to perform demeaing tasks – I know one of your participants (Experiment #2 I think) wanted you to tell her to underess.
Would there be a Dom in the group as well or would that be your role?
Definitely sounds of interest to me, just unsure how experiments tcould be sub/dom without getting too “explicit”.
TakeAllMyClothes likes this
-
Not sure I’d take part, but if there’s enough people wanting to participate, then good luck and have fun. Not for me though.
Ed likes this
-
I haven’t given much thought to the experiment, to be honest. My initial idea was to give commands instead of asking participants, and insist tasks are completed regardless of embarrassment. Nothing explicit and certainly nothing risky or harmful.
I’m not too keen about including a dom in the mix as it will probably make it hard to keep the experiment on track, I’m a bit of a control freak, and, in my personal experience, a lot of doms are just unpleasant people. I’m sure there are nice ones out there, but I haven’t met many.
Gary and Bamaswitch like this
-
-
I agree with Gary. It would totally depend on the experiment.
I would participate in an experiment, but I don’t see getting to the UK with time to do it in the near future. 🙂
Ed likes this
-
- Topics: 40
- Comments: 762
- Total: 802
- Ace Poster
I’ve just tried replying but it disappeared for some reason. I think I said that maybe there’s always a dom/sub aspect to any game, experiment or role play. You give me the excuse to participate by telling me what to do. I take something off because you tell me to. We hide behind the rules of the game, but we’re still essentially allowing someone else to control what we do, even if it’s just in a brief role-play. And vice versa of course. If I roll a 6, I control what happens next, even if all I’m doing is following the rules of the game.
So yes, I could play a sub role in an experiment, but aren’t all participants pretty much doing that in any case?
-
Very good point. I think you’ve hit the nail on the head there. And I like to be the one setting the rules, so I don’t know what that says about me!
Gary and like this
-
With all of that discussion and answers then I think this sounds fun, the whole idea of the experiment is to experience being naked with others so if you’re told rather than encouraged then I’m fine with that.
Ed and like this
-
I guess, fundamentally, I tell people what to do in the experiments anyway. The difference is whether the participants are expecting to be required to comply or encouraged to comply.
Gary likes this
-
Count me in for that idea please.
Ed likes this
-
-
I am interested :o)
Ed likes this
-
It would depend on where and when, but I am interested
Ed likes this
-
-
Something outside our comfort zones – but that’s the whole idea of the experiments.
Outside would be a challenge.
Undressing/being undressed by someone else.
Touching a naked person – not sure how this could/would work.
Being blindfolded.
Being naked then told what challenge to perform and complete before you can dress.
Ed likes this
-
Something outside our comfort zones – but that’s the whole idea of the experiments.
True.
Outside would be a challenge.
Outside is doable, but makes problems more likely. I have to plan a vehicle into the experiment and weather becomes a potential issue. Indoors is much easier to achieve.
Undressing/being undressed by someone else.
That’s a pretty standard component anyway.
Touching a naked person – not sure how this could/would work.
You’re gonna need a bigger consent form! I’m guessing that’s got to include touching parts that strangers don’t normally touch. Touching someone’s hand would not be a challenge.
Being blindfolded.
I can order blindfolds online easily.
Being naked then told what challenge to perform and complete before you can dress.
What sort of challenges were you thinking of?
-
Touching a naked person : almost certainly somewhere normally clothed, this is a challenge/barrier I want to explore, so is definitely a personal “request”.
- Possibly 2 or more naked and blindfolded “players” that have to find and tag each other (have you every watched young children play tag-rugby?), the winner is the last person with a tag.
What sort of challenge : fairly simple unless you’re feeling stressed about the situation.
- Untie a knot with your hands behind you/blinfolded.
- Pick up one (or more) “things” with your mouth and carry them to somewhere else, maybe allowing other participants to be moving obstacles (again touching might be a problem) or just blindfolded so it’s harder to find the from/to locations.
- Walk long a straight line with eyes closed/blindfolded.
- Have several people just with underwear on, if you fail a test then you have to stand naked facing everyone with legs apart and hands on your head until the next person fails the test. The test could something as simple as turning over cards from a deck until you someone gets a pair.
Matt likes this
-
I suspect the consent form for this, as regards touching, might have to specify what is not allowed instead of what is.
I’m still very wary as not touching has always been a limit (although I do warn participants that there has to be minimal non-sexual touching when someone else undresses you).
-
Fair comment on the touching, they are just ideas. I was also hoping mine might prompt others to put their own ideas forward.
You can’t have an experiment with no experiments 😉
Ed likes this
-
-
-
I have seen a few videos of tickling challenges where you either have to not laugh/giggle or not let go of a bar above your head. If you laugh/let go depending on the challenge agreed you have to strip (or be stripped) off one item of clothing. Assuming the touching element could be agreed, this could be interesting??
Ed likes this
-
If you want to take people out of their comfort zone then you could run with psychometric or aptitude testing.
eg, If result is dominant then they strip in front of subservient.
You could use tests for situational judgement. numeracy, aptitude, cognitive ability, etc, to determine outcome of who is naked and who is clothed, who can dress and who can not
The testing would need to be done separate and in advance so the subject does not know what the forfeit or reward will be for their result.-
That might be a bit more formal than I was aiming for, but a very interesting idea.
TakeAllMyClothes likes this
-
-
I agree – this would be turn off
Ed likes this
-
-
-
I saw a post on another site a while back, I cannot remember the name. The challenge involved 2 people being locked into a chastity device or belt and having the keys locked in a combination safe. The two players are clothed to begin with and take turns guessing the combination. You could use your clothes to purchase extra guesses if you felt you were close to guessing correctly. If you guessed the combination correctly you would gain access to the safe and get to keep the other person’s keys. A few days (or was it weeks?).
-
I’m not sure I like the idea of a “chastity device”, I feel it’s straying beyond NE’s topic area.
-
-
-
-
The combination lock has promise, just not sure how to expand it to something we could use.
A normal combination with 4 x 0-9 dials is a lot of combinations, so not sure how that would work.
Possibly a key padlock with lots of keys to choose from but only one works and the naked players take turns to try a key to “get their clothes back”. When you try a key you put it back in the pile and mix them up, so everyone has to find the right key to be able to dress.
Not sure how this could be made embarrasing though. Outside would do it, but as Ed said before, Outside is difficult to arrange.
Could combine it with the naked walk, so players walk naked to the pad;locked box and then have to find the right key?
Ed likes this
-
Or have duplicate padlocks, find the right key then take the key to the box with your clothes and unlock that padlock. (separte keys and padlocks for each person – just don’t drop your key!)
Ed likes this
-
Lots of ideas there, cool. Padlocks is interesting. Maybe locked boxes in different locations (around a field?) Every box has two padlocks. Every participant has one key (which he/she is not permitted to let go of). Participants would have to pair up and travel to random boxes until they find a combination that unlocks both padlocks?
That might take too long and multiple keys to one padlock is probably MUCH easier to organise than multiple padlocks for one key.
Matt likes this
-
-
-
That sounds a great idea! depending on location etc, count me in!
Ed likes this
-
Male female paired, perhaps a combination lock with clues to the numbers scattered about. Perhaps an element of having to get into exposed positions to access the numbers. Low down and bent over, or high up. Or both do something embarrassing as ordered by Ed to be given a number…
-
Combination locks would make like easier for me. Maybe participants have to win combination cards to try on the locked boxes?
Gary likes this
-
-
-
-
-
Yes that’s a good idea.
Maybe mix it with the nude walk by having parts of the combination on cards en route and have a map with the locations.
A mix of naked and racing to get home and orienteering
Getting to a very good game here
Ed likes this
-
-
-
Another idea is to have one less box than people and everyone nude. Then some kind of contest and each time someone wins they get a key to a box. As the game goes on the boxes will be in harder and harder locations inside …and eventually out. After all the boxes are used someone will be nude and there are no clothes left to win!
-
I like that idea but which clothes go in boxes as we won’t know who’s lost when putting the clothes in the boxes. Unless everyone is wearing the same clothing (say disposable overalls?)?
-
All boxes would contain identical clothes. Perhaps own clothes would be at another location we all get driven too at end. So one would be nude for that…
At start all are driven to game in disposable clothes, which will be destroyed at start of game – so no backing out at that point.
Ed likes this
-
So, either the participants could arrive in old clothes, knowing they will be destroyed, or they can change into disposable overalls at the start. Looks like I can get them for about £3-4 each.
Matt likes this
-
-
-
-
-
I’m nterested, outdoors would have to be mixed and I would prefer that anyway to be honest. I’d keep it simple first go, or even do the indoor one I suggested. I do quite like the idea of getting everyone together at the end in various stages of undress depending on how well or badly they did.
-
I agree and I would MUCH prefer to do mixed anyway. However, right now I can’t see that being possible 🙁
John likes this
-
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.