Reply To: New member

Forums Community & News Community News & The Future New member Reply To: New member

#17350
ptHarry
Participant
    • England (London)
    • Topics: 3
    • Comments: 201
    • Total: 204
    • Power Poster
    @patreon_96291032

    Yes, it can do better (with a lot of effort) but it generally concentrates on the foreground.

    If I needed more detail in the background for something important, I would probably try to generate the faces separately as large faces and merge them in a “proper” graphics program. It sort-of defeats the aim of AI, but disguises the fact that I can only really do “engineering” type drawings myself. Resistors, capacitors, assembly diagrams etc. But not faces 🙁

    As I said in the other thread, any “intelligence” in AI would more accurately be described as “superficial” intelligence. What it does is quite amazing when it happens to do what you want it to do, But it’s also quite frustrating when it chooses to do something that’s completely different from what you ask, and no amount of fine tuning will stop it doing that and do what you ask it to do.

    Male anatomy is always a problem. It either wants to leave it out, make it female, or have it doing something inappropriate. I don’t think it’s deliberate censorship. The problem seems to be that it “”learns” from what it has previously found on public pages of the web. Most of the naked images on those are either female or doing pornographic acts.

    I’m in London, which is where Greater Anglia operates from (Liverpool Street or Stratford) and those Hare Fares are very good value when they’re offered, which is not often, so I regularly keep my eyes on them. London to Cromer was £20 return when I went in October (Normal off peak fare is £69)